Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Public availability and adherence to prespecified statistical analysis approaches was low in published randomized trials

9 references·1 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
2011Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials243 cited
2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
2013Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews78 cited
2019Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis37 cited
2020Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials19 cited

Cited by

2023Peer review before trial conduct could increase research value and reduce waste10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work