Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does open peer review improve citation count? Evidence from a propensity score matching analysis of PeerJ

16 references·9 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
2014Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.399 cited
2012Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers393 cited
1998Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports334 cited
2017A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review293 cited
2019The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals276 cited
2000Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial261 cited
2017Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers243 cited
2016Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis218 cited
2015Emerging trends in peer review—a survey192 cited
2007Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

174 cited

2016Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals166 cited

2019Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review165 cited

Cited by

2022Does the author’s collaboration mode lead to papers’ different citation impacts? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching29 cited
2025The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review26 cited
2024Additional experiments required: A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review23 cited
2023Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts19 cited
2022Perceptions regarding open science appraised by editors of scholarly publications published in Spain17 cited
2022The Academic Inbreeding Controversy: Analysis and Evidence from Brazil14 cited
2024Is gold open access helpful for academic purification? A causal inference analysis based on retracted articles in biochemistry13 cited
2021Ensuring effective scholarly communication: traditions and innovations of peer review12 cited
2023What does open peer review bring to scientific articles? Evidence from PLoS journals12 cited