SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine
16 references·4 citing·47 second hop
Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 rapid reviews of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (2020)Choose your shortcuts wisely: COVID-19 ra…Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review (2020)Video calls for reducing soci…The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence (2020)The psychological impact of q…Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial (2020)Single-reviewer abstract scre…Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis (2020)Occurrence, prevention, and m…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews (2018)Redefining rapid reviews: a f…Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Misrepresentation and distort…A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews (2017)A retrospective comparison of…Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic (2015)Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid!…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study. (2005)The librarian's roles in the …Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary (2005)Language of publication restr…Increasing trends and impact of integrative medicine research: From 2012 to 2021 (2022)Increasing trends and impact …Tai Chi for health and well-being: A bibliometric analysis of published clinical studies between 2010 and 2020 (2021)Tai Chi for health and well-b…Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews (2021)Discrete choice experiment to…Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews – RAPeer (2020)Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? (2018)The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (1996)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (1997)The Impact of Event Scale: Revised (2007)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM) (2008)Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic (2020)Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science (2020)Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020)Qualitative research synthesis (2015)Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (2020)Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Nurses' burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2021)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review (2020)Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,975 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,084 cited
  • 2020The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence17,555 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,995 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,246 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,164 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,162 cited
  • 2020Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: rapid review and meta-analysis1,122 cited
  • 2018Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature285 cited
  • 2020Single-reviewer abstract screening missed 13 percent of relevant studies: a crowd-based, randomized controlled trial227 cited
  • 2020Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review226 cited
  • 2005Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary209 cited
  • 2015Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid! …and systematic184 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews
151 cited
  • 2005The librarian's roles in the systematic review process: a case study.111 cited
  • 2017A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews51 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Tai Chi for health and well-being: A bibliometric analysis of published clinical studies between 2010 and 202078 cited
    • 2022Increasing trends and impact of integrative medicine research: From 2012 to 202120 cited
    • 2021Discrete choice experiment to determine preferences of decision-makers in healthcare for different formats of rapid reviews18 cited
    • 2020Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews – RAPeer6 cited