SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it
11 references·4 citing·42 second hopsampled
Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it (2020)Who knew? The misleading specificity of “…Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials (2019)Evidence-based recommendation…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)CONSORT 2010 explanation and …CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors (2006)Who is blinded in randomized …Allocation concealment and blinding: when ignorance is bliss (2005)Allocation concealment and bl…In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials (2002)In the dark The reporting of …Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…Intentional Ignorance: A History of Blind Assessment and Placebo Controls in Medicine (1998)Intentional Ignorance: A Hist…Searching a methods topic: practical challenges and implications for search design (2023)Searching a methods topic: pr…Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners (2022)Planning, design and logistic…Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives (2022)Inconclusives, Errors, and Er…Using Evidence Hierarchies to Find the Best Evidence: A Procrustean Bed? (2021)Using Evidence Hierarchies to…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)An Introduction to the History of Medicine (1914)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)The Emergence of Probability (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta‐epidemiologic study (2009)Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (2012)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals (1997)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Subjective and objective outcomes in randomized clinical trials: definitions differed in methods publications and were often absent from trial reports (2014)Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions (2018)Blinding in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions: a retrospective study of published trial reports (2020)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Systematic reviews in surgery—recommendations from the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery (2021)The Value of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Surgery (2021)The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)A CHecklist for statistical Assessment of Medical Papers (the CHAMP statement): explanation and elaboration (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Trial Protocols and Completed Trials Modified Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Extenuating Circumstances (2021)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials3,824 cited
  • 2011CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials2,342 cited
  • 1998Intentional Ignorance: A History of Blind Assessment and Placebo Controls in Medicine314 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2002In the dark The reporting of blinding status in randomized controlled trials173 cited
  • 2006Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors150 cited
  • 2019Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials123 cited
  • 2005Allocation concealment and blinding: when ignorance is bliss65 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Inconclusives, Errors, and Error Rates in Forensic Firearms Analysis:Three Statistical Perspectives30 cited
  • 2022Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited
  • 2023Searching a methods topic: practical challenges and implications for search design10 cited
  • 2021Using Evidence Hierarchies to Find the Best Evidence: A Procrustean Bed?8 cited