SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleComparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals

Xiomara Sulvey Quispe Chacon2020

OA

Articlegreen2020

Comparing the impact of subfields in scientific journals

Xiomara Sulvey Quispe Chacon · Thiago Christiano Silva · Diego R. Amancio

6 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1998How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators 2005Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities 2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact 2007What do we know about the h index?2007Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals 2002Journal impact measures in bibliometric research 2013Impact Factor Distortions

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2017The science of science: From the perspective of complex systemsarticle · 9 shared references 2020Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not?article · 7 shared references 2020Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles need not be statistically wrongarticle · 7 shared references 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorsarticle · 6 shared references 2021Use of the journal impact factor for assessing individual articles: Statistically flawed or not? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]article · 6 shared references 2021Analyzing the relationship between text features and grants productivityarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-08-05

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations6

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-020-03651-x

openalex_workW3047559939

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.