A variance shrinkage method improves arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis

Zhenxun Wang · Lifeng Lin · James S. Hodges · Richard F. MacLehose · Haitao Chu

10 citations0/0 files storedStatistical Methods in Medical Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Abstract

Network meta-analysis is a commonly used tool to combine direct and indirect evidence in systematic reviews of multiple treatments to improve estimation compared to traditional pairwise meta-analysis. Unlike the contrast-based network meta-analysis approach, which focuses on estimating relative effects such as odds ratios, the arm-based network meta-analysis approach can estimate absolute risks and other effects, which are arguably more informative in medicine and public health. However, the number of clinical studies involving each treatment is often small in a network meta-analysis, leading to unstable treatment-specific variance estimates in the arm-based network meta-analysis approach when using non- or weakly informative priors under an unequal variance assumption. Additional assumptions, such as equal (i.e. homogeneous) variances for all treatments, may be used to remedy this problem, but such assumptions may be inappropriately strong. This article introduces a variance shrinkage method for an arm-based network meta-analysis. Specifically, we assume different treatment variances share a common prior with unknown hyperparameters. This assumption is weaker than the homogeneous variance assumption and improves estimation by shrinking the variances in a data-dependent way. We illustrate the advantages of the variance shrinkage method by reanalyzing a network meta-analysis of organized inpatient care interventions for stroke. Finally, comprehensive simulations investigate the impact of different variance assumptions on statistical inference, and simulation results show that the variance shrinkage method provides better estimation for log odds ratios and absolute risks.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2015Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 2006Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.