Beyond modal idioms and modal harmony: a corpus-based analysis of gradient idiomaticity in mod + adv collocations

Abstract

How do we know thatwould ratherandmay wellare more idiomatic thanwould wellorwill really? Can this intuition be measured systematically in usage data? Traditionally, modal idioms suchhad/’d better,would/’d ratherormight (as) wellare seen as distinct from more compositional collocations, which may be modally harmonic (could possibly,will probably) or not (could also,might even). Yet the collocation of modal auxiliaries + adverbs (mod + adv)is more complex than suggested by a binary classification into idioms and non-idioms. This article uses data from COCA and the method of collostructional analysis to show that the difference between qualitatively distinct types ofmod + advis a matter of degree. Modal idiomaticity should be seen as gradient along a continuum from strong association (would rather) to strong dissociation (would well). The results support assumptions that statistical information about the collocational behavior of modal auxiliaries is a cue for the scope of adverbial modification and is thus an important aspect of speakers’ knowledge of modal meaning. The study contributes to recent approaches to modality from a ‘combinatorial’ perspective, which recognizes the importance of the lexical environment in core areas of grammar.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 18 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.