Activist-journalism and the Norm of Objectivity: Role Performance in the Reporting of the #MeToo Movement in Denmark and Sweden

Jannie Møller Hartley · Tina Askanius

50 citations0/0 files storedJournalism Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Media Studies and Communication Journalism and Media Studies Gender, Feminism, and Media

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study examining the self-perceived roles of journalists covering the #MeToo movement in Denmark and Sweden. Drawing on qualitative interviews with journalists, editors and activists (N = 20) and participant observation at various #MeToo events, we examine the professional journalism cultures underpinning differences in the coverage and the broader public debate spurred by the movement in the two countries. The analysis is informed by the theoretical framework of role performance [Mellado, C. 2015. “Professional Roles in News Content: Six Dimensions of Journalistic Role Performance”. Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.922276; Mellado, C., L. Hellmueller, and W. Donsbach. 2016. Journalistic Role Performance Concepts, Contexts, and Methods. Routledge) in combination with Tuchman’s (1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual”. American Journal of Sociology 77 (4): 660–679) seminal work on “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual”. This combined framework enables an analysis of how journalists negotiate ideals of objective reporting and activist imperatives when covering the movement and issues of gender (in)equality more broadly. Our study shows that journalists, to a varying degree, felt torn between ideals of impartiality and objectivity and ideals of active reporting oriented towards action and problem-solving but that these experiences differed between the two countries and between newsrooms. We discuss these findings in light of differences in the political climates around issues related to gender in the two countries and partially diverging normative ideals and professional journalistic cultures regarding the extent to which journalism and activism can and should be combined.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 50 citations exist upstream.

References

1972Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity 1964The Press and Foreign Policy 1964The Press and Foreign Policy 2018#MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism 1992The American journalist: A portrait of U.S. news people and their work 2014Professional Roles in News Content 2011Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators 1975Professional Models in Journalism: The Gatekeeper and the Advocate

Cited by

2022Hashtag feminism in a blocked context: The mechanisms of unfolding and disrupting #rape on Persian Twitter 2024Shattered lives, unbroken stories: journalists’ perspectives from the frontlines of the Israel–Gaza war 2023Patterns of Journalistic Role Performance during Public Health Crises: Covering COVID-19 in the UK

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.