SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias”
7 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias” (2020)Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors i…Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias (2020)Cognitive and Human Factors i…What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making? (2019)What do forensic analysts con…The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts? (2019)The forensic disclosure model…Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: A conceptual model (2017)Conceptualising forensic scie…The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework (2012)The management of domain irre…From Forensics to Forensic Science (2012)From Forensics to Forensic Sc…Context Effects and Observer Bias—Implications for Forensic Odontology (2011)Context Effects and Observer …Human factors in triaging forensic items: Casework pressures and ambiguity aversion (2025)Human factors in triaging for…Reply to Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias” (2020)Reply to Comment on “Cognitiv…The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion (2002)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Meta‐analytically Quantifying the Reliability and Biasability of Forensic Experts (2008)Practical Solutions to Cognitive and Human Factor Challenges in Forensic Science (2013)Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination (2015)Thinking forensics: Cognitive science for forensic practitioners (2016)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Do confessions taint perceptions of handwriting evidence? An empirical test of the forensic confirmation bias. (2013)Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. (2017)Understanding and Mitigating Bias in Forensic Evaluation: Lessons from Forensic Science (2017)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Scientific foundations and current state of trace evidence—A review (2020)Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? (2021)The relevance of gunshot residues in forensic science (2022)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part II: The critical interaction between research, policy/law and practice (2017)Breaking the barriers between intelligence, investigation and evaluation: A continuous approach to define the contribution and scope of forensic science (2020)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)A hierarchy of expert performance as applied to forensic anthropology (2021)Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)Human Factors in Forensic Science (2023)Heuristic Decision Making (2010)ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work (2019)Linear Sequential Unmasking–Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias (2021)The most consistent finding in forensic science is inconsistency (2023)Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. (1980)The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits (2000)(Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science (2020)Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence (2021)Biases in forensic experts (2018)The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis (1991)Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power (2009)Neural Representation of Subjective Value Under Risk and Ambiguity (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias332 cited
  • 2012From Forensics to Forensic Science146 cited
  • 2017Conceptualising forensic science and forensic reconstruction. Part I: A conceptual model88 cited
  • 2012The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework80 cited
  • 2011Context Effects and Observer Bias—Implications for Forensic Odontology58 cited
  • 2019The forensic disclosure model: What should be disclosed to, and by, forensic experts?40 cited
  • 2019What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?37 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Reply to Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias”6 cited
  • 2025Human factors in triaging forensic items: Casework pressures and ambiguity aversion4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work