SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Compliance With Standards for STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology
13 references·4 citing·53 second hop
Compliance With Standards for STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology (2020)Compliance With Standards for STARD 2015 …A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries (2018)A review of recent publicatio…Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative (2017)Facilitating Prospective Regi…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study (2016)Impact of the mandatory imple…Reproducibility in Science (2014)Reproducibility in ScienceP-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)P-curve: A key to the file-dr…Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin” (2013)Overinterpretation and Misrep…All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies (2013)All That Glitters Isn't Gold:…A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies (2013)A systematic review classifie…Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency (2012)Discussing study limitations …Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Avoidable waste in the produc…Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors (2007)Endorsement of the STARD Stat…Adherence to TRIPOD+AI guideline: an updated reporting assessment tool (2025)Adherence to TRIPOD+AI guidel…Assessment of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 guideline adherence in medical imaging diagnostic accuracy studies published in 2023 (2024)Assessment of Standards for R…Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy? (2023)Has the quality of reporting …Reporting of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Pathology Abstracts: Compliance with STARD for Abstracts Guidelines (2022)Reporting of Artificial Intel…Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) (2018)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update (2019)Cargo Cult Science (1974)Hedging in scientific research articles. By Ken Hyland. (Pragmatics and beyond 54.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998. Pp. x, 307. (1999)Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature (2007)Improving scientific rigour in conservation evaluations and a plea deal for transparency on potential biases (2020)Sample size, study length, and inadequate controls were the most common self-acknowledged limitations in manual therapy trials: A methodological review (2020)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Some Improvements after 10 Years of STARD (2014)Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention (2015)Pitfalls of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Imaging Research (2015)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility (2014)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016)Redefine statistical significance (2017)The Power of Bias in Economics Research (2017)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement (2019)Machine learning prediction models in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review in transparent reporting (2021)STROCSS 2021: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery (2021)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Selection and Reporting of Statistical Methods to Assess Reliability of a Diagnostic Test: Conformity to Recommended Methods in a Peer-Reviewed Journal (2017)Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2018)Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline (2018)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers (2020)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)metaumbrella: the first comprehensive suite to perform data analysis in umbrella reviews with stratification of the evidence (2023)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)A power primer. (1992)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
  • 2013P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.1,501 cited
  • 2014Reproducibility in Science1,031 cited
  • 2013A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies283 cited
  • 2018A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries186 cited
  • 2013Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”158 cited
  • 2016Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study98 cited
  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2012Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency54 cited
  • 2013All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies37 cited
  • 2017Facilitating Prospective Registration of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: A STARD Initiative36 cited
  • 2007Endorsement of the STARD Statement by Biomedical Journals: Survey of Instructions for Authors34 cited

Cited by

  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy?
13 cited
  • 2025Adherence to TRIPOD+AI guideline: an updated reporting assessment tool11 cited
  • 2024Assessment of Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 guideline adherence in medical imaging diagnostic accuracy studies published in 202311 cited
  • 2022Reporting of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Pathology Abstracts: Compliance with STARD for Abstracts Guidelines10 cited