Articlediamond2020

The Impact of Factors on the Audit Quality in Indonesia: The Moderating Effect of Professional Commitments

23 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Academic Research in Accounting Finance and Management Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Corporate Governance and Financial Management Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance Accounting and Financial Management

Abstract

This research is conducted and deemed to determine the effect of professional accounting ethics, auditor competence and professional integrity and commitment to audit quality.In addition, this study aims to determine the effect of auditor competence and integrity auditor on audit quality that is moderated by professional commitment.The population in this study is Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) of DKI Jakarta Province.Sampling is done by purposive sampling method with the criteria of government internal auditors who have taken study and training the JFA (Functional Auditor Functional) and has a minimum of 2 years work experience.The number of samples used in this study amounted to 62 samples of auditors working in Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) of DKI Jakarta Province.The analysis technique used is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using the application Smart Partial Least Square version 3.0.The results of this study indicate that professional accounting ethics and integrity have a significant effect on audit quality.Auditor competency and professional commitment are not significant to audit quality.Professional commitment moderates the influence of the relationship between integrity and audit quality and influences the negative effect.Professional commitment does not moderate the effect of the relationship between auditor competence and audit quality.The contribution given to the BPKP of DKI Jakarta Province is that there is a need for an authoritative, orderly and wellregulated supervisory apparatus in carrying out the duties and functions of the government's internal auditors in accordance with the APIP code of ethics and APIP audit standards.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 23 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Auditor size and audit quality 1980A cognitive (attribution)-emotion-action model of motivated behavior: An analysis of judgments of help-giving.2010Menuju Teori Stewardship Manajemen 2012ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KECENDERUNGAN KECURANGAN AKUNTANSI DENGAN PERILAKU TIDAK ETIS SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING 2005The Impact of Managerial Ownership on the Likelihood of Provision of High Quality Auditing Services 2015The Effect of Working Experience, Integrity, Competence, and Organizational Commitment on Audit Quality (Survey State Owned Companies In Libya)2015The Impact of Professional Accounting Ethics in Quality Assurance in Audit

Cited by

2021Determinants of audit quality: Role of time budget pressure

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.