SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers
16 references·6 citing·36 second hop
Open access at the national level: A comprehensive analysis of publications by Finnish researchers (2020)Open access at the national level: A comp…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science (2019)A Criteria-based Assessment o…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2018)Journal of the Association fo…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)The journal coverage of Web o…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Anatomy of green open access (2013)Anatomy of green open accessPerformance-based university research funding systems (2011)Performance-based university …Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)Journal of the American Socie…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Benchmarking scientific outpu…The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences (1999)The difficulty of achieving f…How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements? (2025)How open are hybrid journals …Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland (2022)Research performance and scho…Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals (2022)Choices of immediate open acc…Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform (2021)Who are the users of national…Open access uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research landscape (2021)Open access uptake in Germany…Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities (2021)Impact and visibility of Norw…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda': are we creating a Frankenstein monster? (2011)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators (2017)Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time (2009)Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization (2015)Smart specialization policy in the European Union: relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification (2018)The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis (2017)The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects (2018)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis5,251 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2006Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology1,164 cited
  • 2011Performance-based university research funding systems1,017 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2018Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology911 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2006Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases498 cited
  • 1999The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences389 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2019A Criteria-based Assessment of the Coverage of Scopus and Web of Science343 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries273 cited
  • 2013Anatomy of green open access228 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Open access uptake in Germany 2010–2018: adoption in a diverse research landscape26 cited
    • 2025How open are hybrid journals included in transformative agreements?21 cited
    • 2021Who are the users of national open access journals? The case of the Finnish Journal.fi platform18 cited
    • 2022Research performance and scholarly communication profile of competitive research funding: the case of Academy of Finland15 cited
    • 2021Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities14 cited
    • 2022Choices of immediate open access and the relationship to journal ranking and publish-and-read deals12 cited