SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
``Why Study History for Science?''
16 references·1 citing·32 second hop
``Why Study History for Science?'' (2000)``Why Study History for Science?''The Science of Mechanics (2013)The Science of MechanicsBenchmarks for Science Literacy (2013)Benchmarks for Science Litera…The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark (1996)The demon-haunted world: scie…National Science Education Standards (1996)National Science Education St…Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine (1995)Why we get sick: the new scie…The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. (1995)The Advancement of Science: S…The Advancement of Science (1995)The Advancement of ScienceNational Science Education Standards (1995)National Science Education St…Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. (1995)Higher Superstition: The Acad…Higher superstition: The Academic left and its quarrels with science (1994)Higher superstition: The Acad…Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist (1991)Darwin: The Life of a Torment…Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (1988)Science as a Process: An Evol…The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance (1983)The growth of biological thou…The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance (1982)The Growth of Biological Thou…Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought (1974)Thematic Origins of Scientifi…Should the History of Science Be Rated X? (1974)Should the History of Science…Does Science Education Need the History of Science? (2008)Does Science Education Need t…Science for all Americans (1990)Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks (2002)Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results (2007)A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education (2016)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Where's the evidence that active learning works? (2006)STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania (2009)ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES (2018)Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions (1994)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)Cognitive Linguistics (2004)Psychological Needs and the Facilitation of Integrative Processes (1995)On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality as a Dynamic Reflection of Well‐Being (1997)The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior (2000)Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform (2000)Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study (2002)Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 (2009)Defining ?science? in a multicultural world: Implications for science education (2000)Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? (2002)Microaggressions (2017)Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education (1996)Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education (2000)The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science (2001)Is Depression an Adaptation? (2000)Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating (2005)Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. (2008)What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers (2001)Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) (2007)The National Science Education Standards (2013)Epidemiology and the web of causation: Has anyone seen the spider? (1994)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995National Science Education Standards7,888 cited
  • 1983The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution, and inheritance2,490 cited
  • 1982The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance2,296 cited
  • 1988Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science2,061 cited
  • 1996National Science Education Standards1,835 cited
  • 2013Benchmarks for Science Literacy1,702 cited
  • 1996The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark825 cited
  • 1995The Advancement of Science780 cited
  • 1995Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine721 cited
  • 1994Higher superstition: The Academic left and its quarrels with science635 cited
  • 1995The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions.604 cited
  • 2013The Science of Mechanics520 cited
  • 1974Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought475 cited
  • 1995Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science.463 cited
  • 1974Should the History of Science Be Rated X?389 cited
  • 1991Darwin: The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

330 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Does Science Education Need the History of Science?76 cited