Articlehybrid2020

Pleasant hostility: Disidentified consumers' emotional and behavioral reactions to a brand crisis

51 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Consumer Behaviour

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Corporate Identity and Reputation

Abstract

Abstract This research explores how consumers react in a crisis situation that happens to a brand with which they disidentify. Consumer–brand disidentification (CBD) is a state of self‐categorization regarding the separation from and rejection of a brand. It predestines individuals to move away from and go against the misbehaving company because the failure of the object of disidentification provides a perfect opportunity for them to validate their identity. We argue that disidentification is closely related not only to a person's propensity to behave but also to feel in a specific way. Surveys data were collected in the United States and Germany to answer the research question regarding the role of emotions in the relationship between CBD and consumers' intention to demonstrate brand‐opposition behavior. Volkswagen, which experienced a crisis related to its manipulation of emission tests, served as the brand stimulus. The results show that CBD can stimulate hostile emotions and schadenfreude, which can function as mediators of the influence of disidentification on brand opposition (negative word‐of‐mouth, brand avoidance, punishing the brand). This research contributes to the growing body of research on the “dark side” of consumer‐brand relationships and its perils for brands. It also enhances understanding of the role of emotions in (dis)identification and social identity research and widens the scholarship on emotions in crises. Managerial implications include to thoroughly consider trade‐offs of creating a strong and unique brand that may give rise to disidentification; monitoring negative voices, especially online; and differentiating disidentified consumers from other types of opposing stakeholders.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 51 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.2004The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior 1998Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research 1992Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification 1991The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time 1994Organizational Images and Member Identification

Cited by

2021Customer-brand disidentification: Conceptualization, scale development and validation 2023Two decades of brand hate research: a review and research agenda 2021Revisiting the effects of inward negative emotions on outward negative emotions, brand loyalty, and negative WOM 2023Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.