Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improving transparency and reproducibility of patent landscapes: the Reporting Items for Patent Landscapes (RIPL) statement and other considerations

11 references·4 citing·52 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
2018Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting508 cited
2010Registration of observational studies: Is it time?152 cited
2018Preregistration Becoming the Norm in Psychological Science101 cited
2013Patent landscaping for life sciences innovation: toward consistent and transparent practices58 cited
2018The Reporting Items for Patent Landscapes statement45 cited
2014The global intellectual property landscape of induced pluripotent stem cell technologies38 cited
2019Adherence to reporting guidelines increases the number of citations: the argument for including a methodologist in the editorial process and peer-review37 cited
2014Patent landscape analysis: A methodology in need of harmonized standards of disclosure31 cited
2017Evidence of insufficient quality of reporting in patent landscapes in the life sciences23 cited

Cited by

2022What, Where, When and How of COVID-19 Patents Landscape: A Bibliometrics Review9 cited
2021An insight into patent landscape analysis of plant stem cells8 cited
2024Intelligent packaging and value generating: Technological development opportunities based on Patent Analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

6 cited

2024The global patent landscape of emerging infectious disease monkeypox6 cited