SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating wider impacts of books via fine-grained mining on citation literatures · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEvaluating wider impacts of books via fine-grained mining on citation literatures

Qingqing Zhou2020

Article2020

Evaluating wider impacts of books via fine-grained mining on citation literatures

Qingqing Zhou · Chengzhi Zhang

8 citations·0/0 files stored·Scientometrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Psychology Research and Bibliometrics Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 8 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis 2013Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar 2010Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar 2010Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar 2015Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity 2011Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus 2008A Comparative Citation Analysis of Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar 2009Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences

Cited by

2021Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2021Impacts towards a comprehensive assessment of the book impact by integrating multiple evaluation sourcesother · 15 shared references 2021Comparison of academic book impact from a disciplinary perspective: an analysis of citations and altmetric indicatorsarticle · 11 shared references 2020Assessing books’ depth and breadth via multi-level mining on tables of contentsarticle · 11 shared references 2019What can Bookmetrix tell us about the impact of Springer Nature’s booksarticle · 10 shared references 2017Filling the citation gap: measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumXarticle · 9 shared references 2018The insoluble problems of books: what does Altmetric.com have to offer?article · 9 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-08-28

VenueScientometrics

ISSN-L0138-9130

Languageen

Citations8

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1007/s11192-020-03676-2

openalex_workW3081996102

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.