Health Forums and Twitter for Dementia Research: Opportunities and Considerations

Nishila Mehta · Lynn Zhu · Kenneth Lam · Nathan M. Stall · Rachel Savage · Stephanie H. Read +5 more

15 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the American Geriatrics Society

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Media in Health Education Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Social media platforms are promising sources for large quantities of participant-driven research data and circumvent some common challenges when conducting dementia research. This study provides a summary of key considerations and recommendations about using these platforms as research tools for dementia. DESIGN: Mixed methods. SETTING: Alzheimer's Society's online Dementia Talking Point forum from inception to April 17, 2018, and Twitter in February and March 2018. PARTICIPANTS: All users of Dementia Talking Point who posted in subforums labeled "I have dementia" and "I care for a person with dementia," and Twitter users whose posts contained the keywords "dementia," "Alzheimer," or "Alzheimer's." MEASUREMENTS: We quantified the average daily number of dementia-related posts on each platform and number of words per post. Guided by a codebook, we conducted thematic content analysis of 5% of the 15,513 posts collected from Dementia Talking Point, and 10% of the 25,948 comprehensible posts from Twitter containing "dementia," "Alzheimer," or "Alzheimer's." We also summarized research-relevant characteristics inherent to platforms and posts. RESULTS: On average, Dementia Talking Point provided less than two new daily dementia-related posts with 213.5 to 241.5 words, compared with 7,883 new daily Twitter posts with 14.5 words. Persons with dementia (PWDs) commonly shared dementia-related concerns (75.7%), experiences (68.6%), and requests for, as well as offers of, information and support (44.3% and 38.6%, respectively). Caregivers commonly shared caregiving experience (67.0%) and requests for information and support (52.5%). Most common dementia-related Twitter posts were derogatory use of the term dementia (14.5%), advocacy, fundraising, and awareness (11.6%), and research dissemination (8.0%). Recommendations about these platforms' unique technical and ethical considerations are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the priorities of PWDs and their caregivers remains important to understand how clinicians can best support them. This study will help clinicians and researcher to better leverage online health forums and Twitter for such dementia-related information.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 15 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study 2001Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities 2012Council of International Organizations for Medical Sciences 2016Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review 2004Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research 2017Ten simple rules for responsible big data research 2013Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review 2016Social media, big data, and mental health: current advances and ethical implications

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.