SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Analysis of potential predatory journals in radiology
14 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Analysis of potential predatory journals in radiology (2020)Analysis of potential predatory journals …Predatory journals in psychiatry (2019)Predatory journals in psychia…Critical appraisal of predatory journals in pathology (2019)Critical appraisal of predato…Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research (2018)Predatory Publishing in Ortho…Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine (2018)Predatory open-access publish…PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion (2017)PubMed should raise the bar f…Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation (2017)Predatory Open Access in Reha…Are Predatory Conferences the Dark Side of the Open Access Movement? (2017)Are Predatory Conferences the…The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. (2015)The story of fake impact fact…Predatory journals are only part of the problem (2015)Predatory journals are only p…Awareness of “Predatory” Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops (2015)Awareness of “Predatory” Open…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…The Downside of Open-Access Publishing (2013)The Downside of Open-Access P…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research (2001)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Pressure to Publish More and the Scope of Predatory Publishing Activities (2016)Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap (2018)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review (2014)The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015 (2015)‘Predatory’ Open Access Journals as Parody: Exposing the Limitations of ‘Legitimate’ Academic Publishing (2017)Predatory journals (2018)Ban predators from the scientific record (2016)The surge of predatory open-access in neurosciences and neurology (2017)Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers (2019)How reliable and useful is Cabell's Blacklist ? A data-driven analysis (2020)Predatory journals enter biomedical databases through public funding (2020)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts (2019)Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals (2022)Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)How predatory journals leak into PubMed (2018)Comprehensive Approach to Open Access Publishing: Platforms and Tools (2019)Predatory Open Access Journals are Indexed in Reputable Databases: a Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem (2020)Scientific peer review (2011)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)Negative Effects of “Predatory” Journals on Global Health Research (2018)Scientific globalism during a global crisis: research collaboration and open access publications on COVID-19 (2020)Open access publishing – noble intention, flawed reality (2022)Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 2013The Downside of Open-Access Publishing117 cited
  • 2017Predatory Open Access in Rehabilitation99 cited
  • 2015Awareness of “Predatory” Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops76 cited
  • 2015The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them.70 cited
  • 2018Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine57 cited
  • 2018Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research56 cited
  • 2017PubMed should raise the bar for journal inclusion48 cited
  • 2017Are Predatory Conferences the Dark Side of the Open Access Movement?38 cited
  • 2015Predatory journals are only part of the problem16 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals in psychiatry14 cited
  • 2019Critical appraisal of predatory journals in pathology11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work