Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A qualitative content analysis of watchlists vs safelists: How do they address the issue of predatory publishing?

16 references·15 citing·35 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
2002A Geopolitics Of Academic Writing833 cited
2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
2011Academic writing in a global context: the politics and practices of publishing in English636 cited
2010Academic Writing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English497 cited
2008Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future457 cited
2004A Geopolitics of Academic Writing359 cited
2017What I learned from predatory publishers306 cited
1993Geopolitics and Geoculture237 cited
2019Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis131 cited
2014Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing117 cited
2017The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School105 cited
2013Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria98 cited
2017Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?93 cited
2018What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

89 cited

2019Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment77 cited

Cited by

2021Are predatory journals contaminating science? An analysis on the Cabells' Predatory Report36 cited
2023Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions35 cited
2022Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles31 cited
2021Signs of divisiveness, discrimination and stigmatization caused by Jeffrey Beall's “predatory” open access publishing blacklists and philosophy29 cited
2021A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers29 cited
2020Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals27 cited
2020Why blacklists are not reliable: A theoretical framework26 cited
2022Medical Resident Awareness of Predatory Journal Practices in an International Medical Education System24 cited
2022Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing23 cited
2023ACADEMIA SHOULD STOP USING BEALL’S LISTS AND REVIEW THEIR USE IN PREVIOUS STUDIES22 cited
2021The citation impact of the Open Access accounting journals that appear on Beall's List of potentially predatory publishers and journals18 cited
2021A “Trojan horse” in the reference lists: Citations to a hijacked journal in SSCI-indexed marketing journals15 cited
2021Revues prédatrices : une vraie menace pour la recherche médicale. 1. Identifier ces revues et comprendre leur fonctionnement13 cited
2025Wolf in sheep’s clothing: An analysis of predatory journals through science mapping10 cited
2023Predator and Alien: the threat of predatory journals and conferences9 cited