Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

International guidance on the selection of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: a review

16 references·1 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis44,511 cited
2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
2017The Content Analysis Guidebook9,228 cited
2005Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation5,518 cited
2010The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study4,259 cited
2018COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures3,333 cited
2017COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures2,473 cited
2007Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes2,372 cited
2018COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study2,328 cited
2002Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria2,267 cited
2013Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,384 cited
2011Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 2—Assessing Respondent Understanding1,133 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2016How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline1,105 cited

2011Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument1,094 cited

2013ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research847 cited

2018Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols813 cited

Cited by

2023Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management73 cited