SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Procédure pour conduire avec succès une revue de littérature selon la méthode PRISMA
8 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Procédure pour conduire avec succès une revue de littérature selon la méthode PRISMA (2020)Procédure pour conduire avec succès une r…Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address (2019)Determining the scope of the …Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial (2019)Assessing risk of bias in a r…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Traduction française des lignes directrices PRISMA pour l’écriture et la lecture des revues systématiques et des méta-analyses (2014)Traduction française des lign…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…Marketing Applications of Emerging Technologies (2024)Marketing Applications of Eme…Marketing Applications of Emerging Technologies and Business Performance of Tourism SMEs (2024)Marketing Applications of Eme…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Traduction française de dix lignes directrices pour l’écriture et la lecture des articles de recherche (2014)La revue systématique et autres types de revue de la littérature : qu’est-ce que c’est, quand, comment, pourquoi ? (2021)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Systematic review of risk and protective factors for suicidal and self-harm behaviors among children and adolescents involved with cyberbullying (2021)How to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic model studies (2022)Twenty years of network meta‐analysis: Continuing controversies and recent developments (2024)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials (2021)Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2019Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial1,761 cited
  • 2019Determining the scope of the review and the questions it will address163 cited
  • 2014Traduction française des lignes directrices PRISMA pour l’écriture et la lecture des revues systématiques et des méta-analyses82 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Marketing Applications of Emerging Technologies37 cited
  • 2024Marketing Applications of Emerging Technologies and Business Performance of Tourism SMEs6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work