SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Getting into the engine room: a blueprint to investigate the shadowy steps of AI ethics
16 references·1 citing·39 second hop
Getting into the engine room: a blueprint to investigate the shadowy steps of AI ethics (2020)Getting into the engine room: a blueprint…The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines (2020)The Ethics of AI Ethics: An E…Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI (2020)Principled Artificial Intelli…The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)The global landscape of AI et…From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices (2019)From What to How: An Initial …A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society (2019)A Unified Framework of Five P…What is data ethics? (2016)What is data ethics?The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)The ethics of algorithms: Map…The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts (2015)The Ethics of Big Data: Curre…Developing a framework for responsible innovation (2013)Developing a framework for re…Republicanism and Political Theory (2008)Republicanism and Political T…Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (2005)Justice, Legitimacy, and Self…Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations (2000)Justification and Legitimacy:…Sorting Things Out (1999)Sorting Things OutRepublicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. (1999)Republicanism: A Theory of Fr…Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government (1998)Republicanism: a theory of fr…A theory of justice original editionA theory of justice original …Engineers on responsibility: feminist approaches to who’s responsible for ethical AI (2024)Engineers on responsibility: …Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (1988)Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity (1994)Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003)Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society (2012)Innovation policy: what, why, and how (2017)Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming (2018)Truth and Method (1960)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2015)Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges (2018)Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019)Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework (2021)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) (2004)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices (2022)Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: A Review (2022)Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks (2014)Emerging challenges in AI and the need for AI ethics education (2020)Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education (2022)The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (2004)Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale (2010)On the people's terms: a republican theory and model of democracy (2013)Bridging the Gap Between Ethics and Practice (2020)Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability (2021)Responsible artificial intelligence governance: A review and research framework (2025)11. Reasons and Persons (1986)Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow (1990)Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business (2003)The Ethnography of Infrastructure (1999)10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization (2008)The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure (2013)Neorepublicanism: A Normative and Institutional Research Program (2009)The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle (2010)The Effect of Police Body-Worn Cameras on Use of Force and Citizens’ Complaints Against the Police: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • n.d.A theory of justice original edition24,876 cited
  • 1999Sorting Things Out6,175 cited
  • 2019The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines6,172 cited
  • 2016The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate3,541 cited
  • 2013Developing a framework for responsible innovation3,175 cited
  • 1998Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government3,066 cited
  • 2020The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines1,900 cited
  • 2019A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society1,612 cited
  • 1999Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.1,075 cited
  • 2020Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI998 cited
  • 2019From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices879 cited
  • 2015The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts713 cited
  • 2016What is data ethics?636 cited
  • 2000Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations626 cited
  • 2008Republicanism and Political Theory583 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2005
Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law
565 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Engineers on responsibility: feminist approaches to who’s responsible for ethical AI16 cited