SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How fast is the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic?
7 references·3 citing·44 second hop
How fast is the peer-review process for orthopaedic publications related to the Covid-19 pandemic? (2020)How fast is the peer-review process for o…Unprecedented surge in publications related to COVID-19 in the first three months of pandemic: A bibliometric analytic report (2020)Unprecedented surge in public…The good, the bad and the rude peer-review (2020)The good, the bad and the rud…The “Infodemic” of Journal Publication Associated with the Novel Coronavirus Disease (2020)The “Infodemic” of Journal Pu…An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (2020)An alarming retraction rate f…Reviews, reviewers and reviewing (2016)Reviews, reviewers and review…Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News (2015)Interpretation of Results of …Reviewing for Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (2012)Reviewing for Clinical Orthop…Time from submission to publication in urology journals: A look at publication times before and during Covid-19 (2023)Time from submission to publi…Time to publication for orthopaedic surgery peer-reviewed journals: A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis (2022)Time to publication for ortho…Covid-19 refereeing duration and impact in major medical journals (2022)Covid-19 refereeing duration …The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1959)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Peer review (2014)How to evaluate reviewers – the international orthopedics reviewers score (INOR-RS) (2019)Defining quality in peer review reports: a scoping review (2025)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)How readers understand causal and correlational expressions used in news headlines. (2016)Claims of causality in health news: a randomised trial (2019)Systematic review finds “spin” practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models (2023)HOW TO REVIEW A PAPER (2003)Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers (2011)Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with International Orthopaedics (2015)Scientific Misconduct (Fraud) in Medical Writing (2018)Editorial bullying: an exploration of acts impacting publication ethics and related environment (2024)Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Stereotype Threat (2015)Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature (2020)Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications (2021)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics (2014)Autopsy of a metaphor: The origins, use and blind spots of the ‘infodemic’ (2021)Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID ‐19 research papers (2021)The causes, impacts and countermeasures of COVID-19 “Infodemic”: A systematic review using narrative synthesis (2021)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021)Global Research Trends of Gender-Related Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Between 2001–2020: A Bibliometric Study (2022)Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)Publication Productivity and Experience: Factors Associated with Academic Rank Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty in the United States (2016)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa (2021)Bibliometric analysis of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)What We Have Learned from Two Decades of Epidemics and Pandemics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Burden of Frontline Healthcare Workers (2021)Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)COVID‐19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review (2021)The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)157 cited
  • 2020Unprecedented surge in publications related to COVID-19 in the first three months of pandemic: A bibliometric analytic report122 cited
  • 2020The good, the bad and the rude peer-review82 cited
  • 2015Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News70 cited
  • 2020The “Infodemic” of Journal Publication Associated with the Novel Coronavirus Disease63 cited
  • 2016Reviews, reviewers and reviewing30 cited
  • 2012Reviewing for Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research28 cited

Cited by

  • 2022Covid-19 refereeing duration and impact in major medical journals7 cited
  • 2022Time to publication for orthopaedic surgery peer-reviewed journals: A cross-sectional bibliometric analysis6 cited
  • 2023Time from submission to publication in urology journals: A look at publication times before and during Covid-194 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work