Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

No evidence for loss aversion disappearance and reversal in Walasek and Stewart (2015).

16 references·10 citing·34 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1979Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk48,459 cited
1992Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty15,457 cited
1982Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice Under Uncertainty4,041 cited
2006A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences2,726 cited
2007The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk1,733 cited
2006Decision by sampling737 cited
1980Translation of Gambles and Aspiration Level Effects in Risky Choice Behavior342 cited
2018The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?309 cited
1999The Effects of Framing, Reflection, Probability, and Payoff on Risk Preference in Choice Tasks273 cited
2006ASPIRATION LEVEL, PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE, AND EXPECTED UTILITY*214 cited
2013On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications194 cited
2014How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: Tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion.172 cited
2014On the Origin of Utility, Weighting, and Discounting Functions: How They Get Their Shapes and How to Change Their Shapes130 cited
2018Acceptable losses: the debatable origins of loss aversion118 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014

A Meta-analysis of Loss Aversion in Product Choice

82 cited

2019Reexamining How Utility and Weighting Functions Get Their Shapes: A Quasi-Adversarial Collaboration Providing a New Interpretation58 cited

Cited by

2020You cannot accurately estimate an individual’s loss aversion using an accept–reject task.18 cited
2018Efficient Coding and Risky Choice15 cited
2020Efficient Coding and Risky Choice14 cited
2025Loss aversion is not robust: A re-meta-analysis11 cited
2021How (not) to test theory with data: Illustrations from Walasek, Mullett, and Stewart (2020).6 cited
2021Acceptance of mixed gambles is sensitive to the range of gains and losses experienced, and estimates of lambda (λ) are not a reliable measure of loss aversion: Reply to André and de Langhe (2021).5 cited
2022The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect5 cited
2023Absolute and relative stability of loss aversion across contexts.3 cited
2026Mapping the functional neurocognitive correlates of loss aversion: A coordinate-based meta-analysis1 cited
2023Absolute and relative stability of loss aversion across contexts1 cited