SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scientific collaboration of researchers and organizations: a two-level blockmodeling approach
16 references·1 citing·37 second hop
Scientific collaboration of researchers and organizations: a two-level blockmodeling approach (2020)Scientific collaboration of researchers a…The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (2017)The Handbook of Science and T…Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries (2011)Mapping world scientific coll…Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures (2011)Identifying the effects of co…The Changing Governance of the Sciences (2007)The Changing Governance of th…Structures of Scientific Collaboration (2007)Structures of Scientific Coll…Scientific collaboration (2007)Scientific collaborationCanadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities (2006)Canadian collaboration networ…The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity (2005)The Impact of Research Collab…An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration (2003)An emerging view of scientifi…What do we measure by co-authorships? (2002)What do we measure by co-auth…Co-authorship and the output of academic economists (2001)Co-authorship and the output …Real science what it is, and what it means (2000)Real science what it is, and …What is research collaboration? (1997)What is research collaboratio…Notions of Position in Social Network Analysis (1992)Notions of Position in Social…Collaboration in an invisible college. (1966)Collaboration in an invisible…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceAcademic co-authorship is a risky game (2023)Academic co-authorship is a r…The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science (2005)Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2015)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900 (2014)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The Tacit Dimension (1997)Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits (1999)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature (2015)International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? (2018)Naturalistic inquiry (1985)Situated Learning (1991)Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. (1994)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration (2016)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration (2004)Climate change and tourism: a scientometric analysis using CiteSpace (2017)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Learning by Expanding (2014)What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community (2003)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Methods for the Scientific Study of Discrimination and Health: An Ecosocial Approach (2012)Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity (1996)Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. (2010)Cisgenderism in psychology: pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008 (2011)What is the Problem with Experts? (2001)Determinants of Risk: Exposure and Vulnerability (2012)Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 1997What is research collaboration?2,985 cited
  • 2005The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity1,643 cited
  • 2017The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies907 cited
  • 1966Collaboration in an invisible college.783 cited
  • 2000Real science what it is, and what it means763 cited
  • 2007Scientific collaboration615 cited
  • 2011Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures470 cited
  • 2011Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries453 cited
  • 2003An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration439 cited
  • 2002What do we measure by co-authorships?413 cited
  • 1992Notions of Position in Social Network Analysis355 cited
  • 2007Structures of Scientific Collaboration275 cited
  • 2007The Changing Governance of the Sciences225 cited
  • 2006Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

215 cited
  • 2001Co-authorship and the output of academic economists207 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Academic co-authorship is a risky game12 cited