Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improving transparency to build trust in real‐world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing—Why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the real‐world evidence transparency initiative

7 references·1 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
2003A Checklist for Retrospective Database Studies—Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Retrospective Databases412 cited
2017Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies206 cited
2010Registration of observational studies: Is it time?152 cited
2014Improving the Transparency of Prognosis Research: The Role of Reporting, Data Sharing, Registration, and Protocols152 cited
2016The GRACE Checklist: A Validated Assessment Tool for High Quality Observational Studies of Comparative Effectiveness132 cited
2010Comparative Effectiveness Research: Challenges for Medical Journals29 cited

Cited by

2024The FAIRification of research in real‐world evidence: A practical introduction to reproducible analytic workflows using Git and R7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work