SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis
16 references·3 citing·35 second hop
Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis (2020)Degree irregularity and rank probability …The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)Ranking treatments in frequen…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)NICE DSU Technical Support Do…Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2 (2011)Conducting Indirect-Treatment…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons (2006)Assessing Evidence Inconsiste…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTER…A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTS (1996)A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META…Bayesian approaches to random‐effects meta‐analysis: A comparative study (1995)Bayesian approaches to random…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool) (2024)Methodological review of NMA …Is Network Meta-analysis a Revolutionary Statistical Tool for Improving the Reliability of Clinical Trial Results? A Brief Overview and Emerging Issues Arising (2023)Is Network Meta-analysis a Re…Network meta‐analysis and random walks (2022)Network meta‐analysis and ran…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)“Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI (2021)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (2021)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Multivariate and network meta-analysis of multiple outcomes and multiple treatments: rationale, concepts, and examples (2017)Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the acute and long-term management of insomnia disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2022)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2015Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods1,725 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression1,114 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2770 cited
  • 2006Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons755 cited
  • 1995Bayesian approaches to random‐effects meta‐analysis: A comparative study

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

568 cited
  • 1996BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS560 cited
  • 2011NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials555 cited
  • 1996A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTS522 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)18 cited
    • 2022Network meta‐analysis and random walks13 cited
    • 2023Is Network Meta-analysis a Revolutionary Statistical Tool for Improving the Reliability of Clinical Trial Results? A Brief Overview and Emerging Issues Arising12 cited