SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology
9 references·1 citing·38 second hop
Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews in dental traumatology (2020)Evidence mapping and quality assessment o…ROBIS: un nuovo strumento sviluppato per valutare i rischi di distorsione nelle revisioni sistematiche (2018)ROBIS: un nuovo strumento svi…Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews on therapeutic interventions for oral cancer (2018)Evidence mapping and quality …What Makes Systematic Reviews Systematic and Why are They the Highest Level of Evidence? (2017)What Makes Systematic Reviews…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas (2011)The Global Evidence Mapping I…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Comparative assessment of scientific reach and utilization of the International Association of Dental Traumatology 2020 guidelines: An altmetric and citation analysis (2023)Comparative assessment of sci…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) (1997)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps (2016)The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management (2016)Evidence and gap maps: a comparison of different approaches (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 2 (2020)The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review (2021)Traditional Chinese medicine for insomnia: Recommendation mapping of the global clinical guidelines (2023)Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR – An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting (2019)Environmental regulation, governance, and policy instruments, 20 years after the stick, carrot, and sermon typology (2020)Methodological quality and reporting quality of COVID-19 living systematic review: a cross-sectional study (2023)Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study (2020)Methodological quality, guidance, and tools in scoping reviews: a scoping review protocol (2021)Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement (2022)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2011The Global Evidence Mapping Initiative: Scoping research in broad topic areas308 cited
  • 2018ROBIS: un nuovo strumento sviluppato per valutare i rischi di distorsione nelle revisioni sistematiche158 cited
  • 2017What Makes Systematic Reviews Systematic and Why are They the Highest Level of Evidence?46 cited
  • 2018Evidence mapping and quality assessment of systematic reviews on therapeutic interventions for oral cancer37 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Comparative assessment of scientific reach and utilization of the International Association of Dental Traumatology 2020 guidelines: An altmetric and citation analysis8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work