Article2020

The “space” of history: A response to Graiver (2020), Rossano (2020), and Smail (2020).

0 citations0/0 files storedHistory of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Philosophy, History, and Historiography Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Abstract

Replies to comments by I. Gravier (see record 2020-68859-002), R. A. Blackwell and M. J. Rossano (see record 2020-68859-003), and D. L. Smail (see record 2020-68859-004) on the article by Henley (see record 2020-68859-001). That each of the commentators acknowledged the significance of the Neolithic for psychology was welcome, as were their alternative views on how such prehistoric events potentially fit with our discipline's history. As new scholarship continues to emerge related to Göbekli Tepe demonstrating radical changes in how Neolithic humans understood themselves, each other, and the world around them, Henley contends that this is significant for our chronicle of the nature of not just "psychology in history" but also deserves "space" within the history of psychology. To reiterate the last line from Smail's reply-"Now all we have to do is persuade the historians". (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.