Ever free relatives crosslinguistically

Abstract

Based on a sample of seven languages, I show that the so-called modal inferencesin ever free relatives (ignorance and indifference) are not universally available. The primaryreading of ever free relatives crosslinguistically turns out to be a “non-modal” one, which isavailable to all languages under investigation. The implication is that if there is a modal inferencetriggered by the use of the ever-morpheme in FRs, the inference is likely to have a sourceexternal to the ever free relative (Lauer, 2009; Condoravdi, 2015; Hirsch, 2016). In line withthis conclusion, I propose to generalize Hirsch’s (2016) analysis of ignorance ever free relatives,suggesting that all ever free relatives, no matter how they are ultimately interpreted, areinstances of (un)conditionals + donkey-anaphoric definite descriptions.Keywords: ever free relatives, (un)conditionals, definite descriptions,modal inferences, crosslinguisticsemantics

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.