SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The importance and value of reporting guidance for scoping reviews: A rehabilitation science example
14 references·2 citing·30 second hop
The importance and value of reporting guidance for scoping reviews: A rehabilitation science example (2020)The importance and value of reporting gui…Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)Reporting scoping reviews—PRI…Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards (2020)Preparing scoping reviews for…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2019)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsPRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update (2018)Does the medical literature r…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature (2013)A systematic scoping review o…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2008)The Strengthening the Reporti…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…The Effectiveness of Digital Communication Media to Improve Adolescent Resilience Skills for Preventing Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review Protocol (2024)The Effectiveness of Digital …Entrepreneurship Studies in The Sultanate of Oman: A Scoping Review of 20 years publications (2021)Entrepreneurship Studies in T…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement (2015)Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (2017)Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies (2017)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2008The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies17,743 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2019Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,217 cited
  • 2020Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension492 cited
  • 2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
  • 2018Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update134 cited
  • 2020Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

82 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Entrepreneurship Studies in The Sultanate of Oman: A Scoping Review of 20 years publications7 cited
  • 2024The Effectiveness of Digital Communication Media to Improve Adolescent Resilience Skills for Preventing Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review Protocol2 cited