SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE?
14 references·5 citing·40 second hop
Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE? (2020)Which are the most sensitive search filte…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach (2017)Identifying reports of random…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2011)COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SY…Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline : a comparison of 38 published search filters (2009)Retrieving randomized control…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006)How to identify randomized co…An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall (2006)An alternative to the hand se…Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed (2002)Development of a highly sensi…How Easy are Randomized Controlled Trials in Epilepsy to Find on Medline? The Sensitivity and Precision of Two Medline Searches (1996)How Easy are Randomized Contr…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care (1994)An investigation of the adequ…A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews. (1993)A high-yield strategy to iden…Development of meta-prompts for Large Language Models to screen titles and abstracts for diagnostic test accuracy reviews (2023)Development of meta-prompts f…Results publications are inadequately linked to trial registrations: An automated pipeline and evaluation of German university medical centers (2022)Results publications are inad…Development and evaluation of a search filter to identify prognostic factor studies in Ovid MEDLINE (2022)Development and evaluation of…Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of Cochrane review searches (2022)Avoiding searching for outcom…Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid (2021)Translation and validation of…Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies (2007)Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies (2010)Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments (2009)2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group (2015)Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Reducing Workload in Systematic Review Preparation Using Automated Citation Classification (2005)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Development of a search filter to identify reports of controlled clinical trials within CINAHL Plus (2019)Trialstreamer: A living, automatically updated database of clinical trial reports (2020)Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review (2022)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Routine development of objectively derived search strategies (2012)Conducting Systematic Reviews of Intervention Questions I: Writing the Review Protocol, Formulating the Question and Searching the Literature (2014)Advances in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: a review of established and emerging interventions (2017)Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2002Development of a highly sensitive search strategy for the retrieval of reports of controlled trials using PubMed833 cited
  • 2006How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on.799 cited
  • 2017Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach186 cited
  • 2006An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall133 cited
  • 2009Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline : a comparison of 38 published search filters126 cited
  • 1994An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care122 cited
  • 1993A high-yield strategy to identify randomized controlled trials for systematic reviews.78 cited
  • 2011COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH70 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1996How Easy are Randomized Controlled Trials in Epilepsy to Find on Medline? The Sensitivity and Precision of Two Medline Searches60 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid33 cited
    • 2022Development and evaluation of a search filter to identify prognostic factor studies in Ovid MEDLINE14 cited
    • 2022Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of Cochrane review searches14 cited
    • 2022Results publications are inadequately linked to trial registrations: An automated pipeline and evaluation of German university medical centers14 cited
    • 2023Development of meta-prompts for Large Language Models to screen titles and abstracts for diagnostic test accuracy reviews9 cited