SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do Parents Know Best?
15 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Do Parents Know Best? (2020)Do Parents Know Best?Joint Versus Sole Physical Custody: Children’s Outcomes Independent of Parent–Child Relationships, Income, and Conflict in 60 Studies (2018)Joint Versus Sole Physical Cu…Mapping paths to family justice: resolving family disputes in neo-liberal times (2017)Mapping paths to family justi…Mapping Paths to Family Justice (2017)Mapping Paths to Family Justi…Family Law and Personal Life (2017)Family Law and Personal LifeLawyers and Mediators : The Brave New World of Services for Separating Families (2016)Lawyers and Mediators : The B…Who Knows What is Best for Children? Honoring Agreements and Contracts Between Parents Who Live Apart (2014)Who Knows What is Best for Ch…Child Custody Revisited (2014)Child Custody RevisitedMediation Regarding Children - Is the Result Always in the Best Interests of the Child? A View from Sweden (2012)Mediation Regarding Children …“Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat (2011)“Not of the Highest Importanc…Article 3 : the best interests of the child (2007)Article 3 : the best interest…Safeguarding Children's Welfare in Non‐Contentious Divorce: Towards a New Conception of the Legal Process? (2000)Safeguarding Children's Welfa…Law, Law Reform and the Family (1998)Law, Law Reform and the FamilyDivorce mediation and the legal process (1988)Divorce mediation and the leg…The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life. (1986)The Protection of Children: S…Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy (1975)Child-Custody Adjudication: J…Solicitors and divorce (1992)Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Solicitors (2000)Family Law and Personal Life (2007)Justifying the LASPO Act: authenticity, necessity, suitability, responsibility and autonomy (2017)Legal professionals’ knowledge and experience of autistic adults in the family justice system (2018)Tensions and contradictions in family court innovation with high risk parents: The place of family drug treatment courts in contemporary family justice (2018)Internet banking: modelling the e‐competence of customers with a text‐analytic CIT approach (2005)Best Interest of the Child (2013)Institutional Aspects of the Nordic Justice Systems: Striving for Consolidation and Settlements (2021)The Role of the Father in Child Development (1985)Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. (1995)An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. (2009)Joint versus sole physical custody: Outcomes for children independent of family income or parental conflict (2018)Children in dual-residence arrangements: a literature review (2020)The Evolution of Fathering Research in the 21st Century: Persistent Challenges, New Directions (2020)Coparenting in the Second Year after Divorce (1990)Family mediation: Facts, myths, and future prospects. (2001)A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations (2005)Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts (1999)Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice (2007)Child Protection Systems (2011)Inducing demand for family mediation – before and after LASPO (2017)Relational Vulnerability: The Legal Status of Cohabiting Carers (2019)Emotional adaptation to relationship dissolution in parents and non-parents: A new conceptual model and measure (2020)The price is rights!: Cost benefit analysis and the resourcing of children's services (2019)Assessment of Children in Need in a Post-Soviet Context: Reflections of Child Protective Workers in Estonia (2015)‘Inheritance Families of Choice’? Lawyers' Reflections on Gay and Lesbian Wills (2016)Judging the Child’s Best Interests (2010)The formalized framework for decision-making in child protection care orders: A cross-country analysis (2015)Backlash Goes Global: Men's Groups, Patriarchal Family Policy, and the False Promise of Gender-Neutral Laws (2016)Research in family mediation: Review and implications (1995)A critical reappraisal of divorce mediation research and policy. (2000)What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life.312 cited
  • 1975Child-Custody Adjudication: Judicial Functions in the Face of Indeterminacy295 cited
  • 2018Joint Versus Sole Physical Custody: Children’s Outcomes Independent of Parent–Child Relationships, Income, and Conflict in 60 Studies74 cited
  • 2007Article 3 : the best interests of the child72 cited
  • 1988Divorce mediation and the legal process68 cited
  • 2017Mapping Paths to Family Justice45 cited
  • 2017Family Law and Personal Life34 cited
  • 2016Lawyers and Mediators : The Brave New World of Services for Separating Families24 cited
  • 2011“Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat21 cited
  • 2012Mediation Regarding Children - Is the Result Always in the Best Interests of the Child? A View from Sweden14 cited
  • 1998Law, Law Reform and the Family14 cited
  • 2014Child Custody Revisited13 cited
  • 2000Safeguarding Children's Welfare in Non‐Contentious Divorce: Towards a New Conception of the Legal Process?10 cited
  • 2017Mapping paths to family justice: resolving family disputes in neo-liberal times10 cited
  • 2014Who Knows What is Best for Children? Honoring Agreements and Contracts Between Parents Who Live Apart

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.