Boundary Conditions for the Practical Importance of Small Effects in Long Runs: A Comment on Funder and Ozer (2019)

James D. Sauer · Aaron Drummond

17 citations0/0 files storedAdvances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Funder and Ozer (2019) argued that small effects can haveimportant implications in cumulative long-run scenarios.We certainly agree. However, some important caveatsmerit explicit consideration. We elaborate on the previously acknowledged importance of preregistration (andopen-data practices) and identify two additional considerations for interpreting small effects in long-run scenarios: restricted extrapolation and construct validity

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1992A power primer.2011False-Positive Psychology 2019Evaluating Effect Size in Psychological Research: Sense and Nonsense 2019The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use 1985A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot.2014The Statistical Crisis in Science 2019The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases 1975Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer Research

Cited by

2022Time spent playing video games is unlikely to impact well-being

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.