Underrepresented racial minorities in biomedical informatics doctoral programs: graduation trends and academic placement (2002–2017)

Kevin Wiley · Brian Edward Dixon · Shaun J. Grannis · Nir Menachemi

14 citations0/0 files storedJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Career Development and Diversity Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Biomedical informatics attracts few underrepresented racial minorities (URMs) into PhD programs. We examine graduation trends from 2002 to 2017 to determine how URM representation has changed over time. We also examine academic job placements by race and identify individual and institutional characteristics associated with URM graduates being successfully placed in academic jobs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyze a near census of all research doctoral graduates from US-accredited institutions, surveyed at graduation by the National Science Foundation Survey of Earned Doctorates. Graduates of biomedical informatics-related programs were identified using self-reported primary and secondary disciplines. Data are analyzed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: During the study period, 2426 individuals earned doctoral degrees in biomedical informatics-related disciplines. URM students comprised nearly 12% of graduates, and this proportion did not change over time (2002-2017). URMs included Hispanic (5.7%), Black (3.2%), and others, including multi-racial and indigenous American populations (2.8%). Overall, 82.3% of all graduates accepted academic positions at the time of graduation with significantly more Hispanic graduates electing to go into academia (89.2%; P < .001). URM graduates were more likely to be single (OR = 1.38; P < .05), have a dependent (1.95; P < .01), and not receive full tuition remission (OR = 1.37; P = .05) as a student. URM graduates accepting an academic position were less likely to be a graduate of a private institution (OR = 0.70; P < .05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proportion of URM candidates among biomedical informatics doctoral graduates has not increased over time and remains low. In order to improve URM recruitment and retention within academia, leaders in biomedical informatics should replicate strategies used to improve URM graduation rates in other fields.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

2019Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations 2018Ensuring Fairness in Machine Learning to Advance Health Equity 2016Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM 2008Diversifying Science: Underrepresented Student Experiences in Structured Research Programs 2014Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM Diversity, Persistence, and Success 2010Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project 2012Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce: Developing Talent 2011Racial and Ethnic Minority Students' Success in STEM Education

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.