SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Development and application of an outcome-centric approach for conducting overviews of reviews
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Development and application of an outcome-centric approach for conducting overviews of reviews (2020)Development and application of an outcome…Sleep duration and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews (2020)Sleep duration and health in …Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for…Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data (2019)Overviews of reviews incomple…Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence (2018)Toward a comprehensive eviden…An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview (2018)An introduction to overviews …Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction (2017)Toward a comprehensive eviden…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary (2016)What guidance is available fo…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview (2014)Systematic review finds overl…Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review (2012)Overviews of reviews often ha…A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011 (2012)A Descriptive Analysis of Ove…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Umbrella reviews: what they are and why we need them (2019)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Examining overlap of included studies in meta‐reviews: Guidance for using the corrected covered area index (2019)Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review (2020)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data (2015)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Revisões da literatura científica: tipos, métodos e aplicações em enfermagem (2018)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)What factors affect patients’ ability to access healthcare? An overview of systematic reviews (2021)Sleep Health: Can We Define It? Does It Matter? (2014)Sleep timing and health indicators in children and adolescents: a systematic review (2022)Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration: A prospective cohort study (2023)The impact of screen use on sleep health across the lifespan: A National Sleep Foundation consensus statement (2024)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2014Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview1,308 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2016Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study766 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2020Sleep duration and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews353 cited
  • 2018An introduction to overviews of reviews: planning a relevant research question and objective for an overview314 cited
  • 2012A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011241 cited
  • 2019Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR): a protocol for development of a reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions228 cited
  • 2012Overviews of reviews often have limited rigor: a systematic review213 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary
195 cited
  • 2017Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1—purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction184 cited
  • 2018Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence139 cited
  • 2019Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data71 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.