SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction
7 references·2 citing·36 second hop
Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction (2020)Authors' noninstitutional emails and thei…Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses (2021)Revisiting the decay of scien…Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countries (2018)Retractions covered by Retrac…Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China (2018)Journal Retractions: Some Uni…Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one? (2018)Do papers with an institution…Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)Retractions in cancer researc…China cracks down on fake peer reviews (2017)China cracks down on fake pee…Do researchers provide public or institutional E‐mail accounts as correspondence E‐mails in scientific articles? (2014)Do researchers provide public…Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills” (2023)Assessment of retracted paper…Tamquam alter idem: formal similarities in a subset of reports on anti-inflammatory compounds in the years 2008–2019 (2022)Tamquam alter idem: formal si…E-mail characteristics, work performance and distress (2009)Expressions of Dissent in Email: Qualitative Insights Into Uses and Meanings of Organizational Dissent (2013)Work and personal e‐mail use by university employees: PIM practices across domain boundaries (2013)Are Mandatory Institutional Emails for Manuscript Submission an Unfair and Discriminatory Policy? (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Analysis of retractions in Indian science (2019)Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018 (2019)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Journal of Education and Practice (2017)Characteristics of retracted articles based on retraction data from online sources through February 2019 (2020)Institution name disambiguation for research assessment (2013)Bung the gap: narrowing Global North –Global South bias inmeasuring academic excellence by weighting with academic capital (2019)Not all areas are equal: analysis of citations in information security research (2019)Metadata analysis of retracted fake papers in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2023)The emergence of China as a leading nation in science (2005)The great betrayal: fraud in science (2005)Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China (2021)Exploring scientific misconduct in Morocco based on an analysis of plagiarism perception in a cohort of 1,220 researchers and students (2022)Publish or perish: a study on academic misconduct in publishing among Chinese doctoral students (2025)Applied Discrete-Time Queues (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills (2021)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)The Essential Tension (1977)Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies (2015)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)Commensuration of the globalised higher education sector: how university rankings act as a credential for world-class status in China (2019)Keeping a clean research environment: Addressing research misconduct and improving scientific integrity in China (2019)Understanding China's construction of an academic integrity system: A grounded theory study on national level policies (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey83 cited
  • 2018Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countries58 cited
  • 2018Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China26 cited
  • 2018Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one?20 cited
  • 2017China cracks down on fake peer reviews16 cited
  • 2014Do researchers provide public or institutional E‐mail accounts as correspondence E‐mails in scientific articles?8 cited
  • 2021Revisiting the decay of scientific email addresses7 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”10 cited
  • 2022Tamquam alter idem: formal similarities in a subset of reports on anti-inflammatory compounds in the years 2008–20195 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work