SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleUsing the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars

Tanya L. Trotter2020

Article2020

Using the peer review process to educate and empower emerging nurse scholars

Tanya L. Trotter

14 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Professional Nursing

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic Writing and Publishing Publishing and Scholarly Communication Health Sciences Research and Education

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 14 citations exist upstream.

References

2002Peer review in health sciences 2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.1999Peer Review in Health Sciences 2019Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM 2017Expertise versus Bias in Evaluation: Evidence from the NIH 2018Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada 2008Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians)2003A Multilevel Cross-Classified Modelling Approach to Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Effects of Assessor and Researcher Attributes on Assessor Ratings

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2018Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiencyother · 7 shared references 2021When Zero May Not Be Zero: A Cautionary Note on the Use of Inter-Rater Reliability in Evaluating Grant Peer Reviewarticle · 6 shared references 2015Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for Researcharticle · 6 shared references 2021A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018article · 6 shared references 2020Decision-making approaches used by UK and international health funding organisations for allocating research funds: A survey of current practicearticle · 6 shared references 2023Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applicationsarticle · 6 shared references

Details

Year2020

Typearticle

Published2020-10-30

VenueJournal of Professional Nursing

ISSN-L1532-8481

Languageen

Citations14

Files0 public / 0

ShelfAcademic Writing and Publishing

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.10.009

openalex_workW3095129354

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.