SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating an Enteral or Parenteral Nutrition Intervention in Critical Illness According to the CONSORT Statement: A Systematic Review and Recommendation of Minimum Standard Reporting Criteria
10 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials Investigating an Enteral or Parenteral Nutrition Intervention in Critical Illness According to the CONSORT Statement: A Systematic Review and Recommendation of Minimum Standard Reporting Criteria (2020)Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials…A Core Outcome Set for Critical Care Ventilation Trials (2019)A Core Outcome Set for Critic…Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results (2018)Why all randomised controlled…Quality of development and reporting of dietetic intervention studies in primary care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2017)Quality of development and re…Methodologic quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease outcomes: a review (2016)Methodologic quality of meta-…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature (2002)Quality of reporting of rando…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)What is the quality of reporting in weight loss intervention studies? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (2007)A systematic review of trends in the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in various research fields (2008)Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials published in Intensive Care Medicine from 2001 to 2010 (2013)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Understanding Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (2016)Generating the evidence for risk reduction: a contribution to the future of food-based dietary guidelines (2018)Effectiveness of flipped classroom in nursing education: A systematic review of systematic and integrative reviews (2022)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Mapping the literature on primary care research reporting: a scoping review (2020)Protocol for a meta-research study of protocols for diet or nutrition-related trials published in indexed journals: general aspects of study design, rationale and reporting limitations (2022)Completeness of Reporting in Diet- and Nutrition-Related Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews With Meta-Analysis: Protocol for 2 Independent Meta-Research Studies (2023)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)For whom does “what works” work? The political economy of evidence-based education (2019)Randomized Control Trials and Qualitative Evaluations of a Multifaceted Programme for Women in Extreme Poverty: Empirical Findings and Methodological Reflections (2019)Expectancy in placebo-controlled trials of psychedelics: if so, so what? (2022)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
  • 2018Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results174 cited
  • 2019A Core Outcome Set for Critical Care Ventilation Trials106 cited
  • 2002Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in the intensive care literature48 cited
  • 2016Methodologic quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews on the Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease outcomes: a review38 cited
  • 2017Quality of development and reporting of dietetic intervention studies in primary care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials23 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work