SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills
3 references·6 citing·35 second hop
Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills (2020)Publishing ethics in the era of paper mil…Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Digital magic, or the dark ar…The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)The Prevalence of Inappropria…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals (2024)Verification of nucleotide se…How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem (2024)How to fight fake papers: a r…Tamquam alter idem: formal similarities in a subset of reports on anti-inflammatory compounds in the years 2008–2019 (2022)Tamquam alter idem: formal si…The 1-h fraud detection challenge (2021)The 1-h fraud detection chall…Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity (2021)Fake data, paper mills, and t…Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers (2020)Scientific authorship: a prim…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? (2018)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)China's Publication Bazaar (2013)Publish or impoverish (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)China bans cash rewards for publishing papers (2020)The raw truth about paper mills (2021)Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: Evidence from a Russia‐based paper mill (2023)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production (2016)COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected (2020)How Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology deals with fraudulent papers from paper mills (2021)The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)From plagiarism to scientific paper mills: a profile of retracted articles within the SciELO Brazil collection (2022)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)CSP em 40 anos de publicação científica (2024)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)The Essential Tension (1977)Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies (2015)The natural selection of bad science (2016)GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences (2020)Distortion of journal impact factors in the era of paper mills (2023)Machine learning based screening of potential paper mill publications in cancer research: methodological and cross sectional study (2026)Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent (2011)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)An extra pair of eyes: adopting innovative approaches to detect integrity issues in Naunyn–Schmiedeberg’s Archives of Pharmacology (2025)Authors must follow the editorial guidelines on the use of large language models in review papers (2025)Open science and transparency are our strongest tools in the fight against fraudulent publishing activities (2025)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?1,147 cited
  • 2016The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications287 cited
  • 2020Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?133 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Fake data, paper mills, and their authors: The International Journal of Cancer reacts to this threat to scientific integrity35 cited
  • 2024How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem25 cited
  • 2020Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers18 cited
  • 2024Verification of nucleotide sequence reagent identities in original publications in high impact factor cancer research journals14 cited
  • 2021The 1-h fraud detection challenge13 cited
  • 2022Tamquam alter idem: formal similarities in a subset of reports on anti-inflammatory compounds in the years 2008–20195 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work