Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design
Abstract
Accessibility research and disability studies are intertwined fields focused on, respectively, building a world more inclusive of people with disability and understanding and elevating the lived experiences of disabled people. Accessibility research tends to focus on creating technology related to impairment, while disability studies focuses on understanding disability and advocating against ableist systems. Our paper presents a reflexive analysis of the experiences of three accessibility researchers and one disability studies scholar. We focus on moments when our disability was misunderstood and causes such as expecting clearly defined impairments. We derive three themes: ableism in research, oversimplification of disability, and human relationships around disability. From these themes, we suggest paths toward more strongly integrating disability studies perspectives and disabled people into accessibility research.
Cite this
Megan Kelly Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer C. Mankoff, Cynthia L. Bennett (2020). Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996
@article{kelly2020living,
title = {Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design},
author = {Hofmann, Megan Kelly and Kasnitz, Devva and Mankoff, Jennifer C. and Bennett, Cynthia L.},
year = {2020},
journal = {International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS)},
doi = {10.1145/3373625.3416996}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 201 citations exist upstream.