A Creative Living Lab for the Adaptive Reuse of the Morticelli Church: The SSMOLL Project

Maria Cerreta · Ludovica La Rocca · Alessia Elefante

49 citations0/0 files storedSustainability

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation Urban Development and Cultural Heritage Urban Planning and Valuation

Abstract

The international debate on the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage sites consistent with the Sustainable Development Goals has become increasingly important in the implementation of circular economy models for urban policies. The new values that characterize cultural assets, considered the result of a collaborative process, can enhance both manufactured and human capital, and provide the basis for a system of relationships that binds them. Furthermore, the values of historical artistic assets produced by community-based regeneration processes are particularly relevant when they characterize abandoned commons and cult buildings, to which communities attribute an identity and symbolic value. Starting from the definition of the concept of complex social value, we propose a methodological process that combines approaches and techniques typical of deliberative evaluations and collaborative decision-making processes. The aim is to identify the complex value chains generated by adaptive reuse, in which intrinsic values can play a driving role in the regeneration strategies of discarded cultural heritage. The experimentation, tested with the project “San Sebastiano del Monte dei Morti Living Lab” (SSMOLL), activates a creative and cultural Living Lab in the former Morticelli church, in the historic center of Salerno, in southern Italy. The reuse project is part of a more comprehensive process of social innovation and culture-led urban regeneration triggered in Salerno starting from SSMOLL. The partial results of the process show how a co-exploration phase has characterized the cultural characteristic of the living lab and how the co-evaluation of the individual activities orient the possible reuse scenarios. Finally, the results provide a first analysis of the relationship types activated.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 49 citations exist upstream.

References

2014Fourth Generation Evaluation 2015A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems 2012Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world 1992Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking 1999The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review 2007The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment 2005Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture's Contribution to Regeneration 2015What are shared and social values of ecosystems?

Cited by

2022Living labs in the context of the UN sustainable development goals: state of the art 2022Transition towards a circular economy: A review of the role of higher education as a key supporting stakeholder in Web of Science 2022Driving systematic circular economy implementation in the construction industry: A construction value chain perspective 2022A Systematic Review of the Literature on Living Labs in Higher Education Institutions: Potentials and Constraints

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.