References

• 2009American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering869 cited
• 2005Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee836 cited
• 2019A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection216 cited
• 2012The Efficiency and Accuracy of The Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, Errors on the First 10 Items of The Test of Memory Malingering, and Five Embedded Measures in Predicting Invalid Test Performance189 cited
• 2017Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: a clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature161 cited
• 2008Dementia and effort test performance154 cited
• 2020Base Rates of Invalid Test Performance Across Clinical Non-forensic Contexts and Settings151 cited
• 2017Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees103 cited
• 2017Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test—Revised: A Replication Study94 cited
• 2014Examination of Performance Validity Test Failure in Relation to Number of Tests Administered92 cited
• 1994Validation of a detector of response bias on a forced-choice test of nonverbal ability.91 cited
• 2018Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests