SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature
16 references·1 citing·40 second hop
For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature (2020)For how long and with what relevance do g…Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2021)Recommendations for the Condu…Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis (2019)Reasons for article retractio…Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology (2019)Plagiarism and data falsifica…Rethinking retractions (2018)Rethinking retractionsGoogle Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)Retractions in cancer researc…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …The incidence and role of negative citations in science (2015)The incidence and role of neg…Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers (2015)Costly collaborations: The im…An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies (2015)An International Study of Res…The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks (2014)The (lack of) Impact of Retra…Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)The Retraction Penalty: Evide…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research? (2011)Retractions in the medical li…A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)A European Code of Conduct fo…Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines (2022)Improving the Reliability of …The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Endogenous Technological Change (1989)Endogenous Technological Change (1990)Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature (2018)Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016) (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models (1999)Nonreplicable publications are cited more than replicable ones (2021)Citation Statistics (2009)Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud? (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2016)The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’ (2017)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research (2018)Should research misconduct be criminalized? (2020)Temporal characteristics of retracted articles (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations (2019)Data sharing for novel coronavirus (COVID-19) (2020)How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review (2021)Scientific misbehavior in economics (2014)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2010A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity511 cited
  • 2021Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals216 cited
  • 2013The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science191 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2015The incidence and role of negative citations in science188 cited
  • 2015An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies185 cited
  • 2011Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?156 cited
  • 2018Rethinking retractions149 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
  • 2014The (lack of) Impact of Retraction on Citation Networks89 cited
  • 2019Reasons for article retraction in anesthesiology: a comprehensive analysis86 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2015
Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers
83 cited
  • 2017Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey83 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines14 cited