SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts
16 references·16 citing·35 second hopsampled
Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation countsTesting the fairness of citation indicato…Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)Turning the tables on citatio…The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates (2011)The skewness of science in 21…Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…Citation Statistics (2009)Citation StatisticsWhat do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)What do citation counts measu…Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Universality of citation dist…Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor (2008)Modifying the journal impact …Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-…Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Theory and practise of the g-…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (2005)Citation Statistics from 110 …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…The scientific impact of nations (2004)The scientific impact of nati…Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)Problems of citation analysis…Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact (1986)Relative indicators and relat…Clustering thescience citation index ® using co-citations (1985)Clustering thescience citatio…Private label management: A literature review (2020)Private label management: A l…Identify Topic Relations in Scientific Literature Using Topic Modeling (2019)Identify Topic Relations in S…Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics (2018)Critical rationalism and the …Recent Development of Social Simulation as Reflected in JASSS Between 2008 and 2014: A Citation and Co-Citation Analysis (2017)Recent Development of Social …Successful fish go with the flow: citation impact prediction based on centrality measures for term–document networks (2016)Successful fish go with the f…Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach (2016)Ranking authors using fractio…How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index (2016)How to normalize Twitter coun…Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator (2016)Citation score normalized by …Completing h (2015)Completing hThe effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014)The effect on citation inequa…Differences in citation impact across countries (2014)Differences in citation impac…Bibliometric indicators of young authors in astrophysics: Can later stars be predicted? (2014)Bibliometric indicators of yo…The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields (2013)The Measurement of the Effect…Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures (2013)Quantitative evaluation of al…Field‐normalized impact factors ( IFs ): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)Field‐normalized impact facto…How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2012)How can journal impact factor…Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)The h index and career assessment by numbers (2006)Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science (2015)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators (2003)Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010)Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods (2016)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact (2013)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)O papel da informetria e da cienciometria e sua perspectiva nacional e internacional (1998)Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? (2010)From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2006Theory and practise of the g-index2,347 cited
  • 2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
  • 2004The scientific impact of nations1,244 cited
  • 2008Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact810 cited
  • 1989Problems of citation analysis: A critical review803 cited
  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 1986Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact448 cited
  • 2005Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review420 cited
  • 2009Citation Statistics285 cited
  • 1985Clustering thescience citation index ® using co-citations282 cited
  • 2007Lifting the crown—citation z-score274 cited
  • 2011Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents190 cited
  • 2008Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor180 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011The skewness of science in 219 sub-fields and a number of aggregates156 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Quantitative evaluation of alternative field normalization procedures55 cited
    • 2013The Measurement of the Effect on Citation Inequality of Differences in Citation Practices across Scientific Fields52 cited
    • 2016How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index49 cited
    • 2020Private label management: A literature review47 cited
    • 2016Successful fish go with the flow: citation impact prediction based on centrality measures for term–document networks45 cited
    • 2019Identify Topic Relations in Scientific Literature Using Topic Modeling43 cited
    • 2017Recent Development of Social Simulation as Reflected in JASSS Between 2008 and 2014: A Citation and Co-Citation Analysis42 cited
    • 2016Ranking authors using fractional counting of citations: An axiomatic approach41 cited
    • 2018Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics41 cited
    • 2012How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts38 cited
    • 2016Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator38 cited
    • 2014Differences in citation impact across countries35 cited
    • 2014The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level33 cited
    • 2013Field‐normalized impact factors ( IFs ): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs33 cited
    • 2014Bibliometric indicators of young authors in astrophysics: Can later stars be predicted?33 cited
    • 2015Completing h30 cited