SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleEvaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings

Unknown author2015

OA

Articlegreen2015

Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankings

Unknown author

26 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Informetrics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

scientometrics and bibliometrics research Higher Education Governance and Development Web visibility and informetrics

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

2005The Academic Ranking of World Universities 2009The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change 2011Performance-based university research funding systems 1979Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods 2010University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison 2010Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations 2014How do you define and measure research productivity?

Cited by

2022Is it necessary to evaluate university research performance instrument? Evidence from Indonesia 2021Ranking institutions within a discipline: The steep mountain of academic excellence 2022Research strength index to identify the performance of research universities: the case of Indonesia 2016A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS 2018Factors Influencing Cities’ Publishing Efficiency

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2015Evaluating university research: Same performance indicator, different rankingsarticle · 23 shared references 2016The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universitiesarticle · 13 shared references 2016The ratio of top scientists to the academic staff as an indicator of the competitive strength of universitiesarticle · 13 shared references 2014A multivariate stochastic model to assess research performancearticle · 9 shared references 2013Are the authors of highly cited articles also the most productive ones?article · 8 shared references 2014Should the research performance of scientists be distinguished by gender?article · 8 shared references

Details

Year2015

Typearticle

Published2015-06-01

VenueJournal of Informetrics

ISSN-L1751-1577

Languageen

Citations26

Files0 public / 0

Shelfscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.002

openalex_workW3099108658

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2024

Research performance evaluation model in university: evidence from Indonesia