SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An empirical and theoretical critique of the Euclidean index
16 references·0 citing·37 second hopsampled
An empirical and theoretical critique of the Euclidean index (2017)An empirical and theoretical critique of …Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012:…The inconsistency of the h‐index (2011)The inconsistency of the h‐in…The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators (2010)The Evaluation of Research by…The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations (2009)The e-Index, Complementing th…New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation (2009)New developments in the use o…A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)A Principal Component Analysi…Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine (2008)Are there better indices for …The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Comple…The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Comple…Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Comparison of the Hirsch-inde…A Hirsch-type index for journals (2006)A Hirsch-type index for journ…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…To Intervene or Not to Intervene (1996)To Intervene or Not to Interv…The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)The Matthew effect in science…The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew Effect in ScienceCitation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Science of science (2018)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery (1961)The Scientific Community. (1966)Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy (1986)Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law (2005)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales (1998)ArXiv.org e-print archive (2004)Sleeping Beauties in science (2004)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. (1996)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)The Social System (1951)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Communication And Persuasion (2017)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Publish and perish? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism (2010)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output12,131 cited
  • 1968The Matthew Effect in Science7,959 cited
  • 1968The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.4,791 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics3,281 cited
  • 2006A Hirsch-type index for journals671 cited
  • 2009A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures635 cited
  • 2006Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups622 cited
  • 2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index616 cited
  • 2009New developments in the use of citation analysis in research evaluation524 cited
  • 2008Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine510 cited
  • 2009The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations465 cited
  • 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation450 cited
  • 2011The inconsistency of the h‐index358 cited
  • 2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index350 cited
  • 1996To Intervene or Not to Intervene

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

316 cited
  • 2010The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators189 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.