SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine
16 references·3 citing·28 second hop
A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine (2020)A brief guide to the science and art of w…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a mu…Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Transparent reporting of a mu…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensu…Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services (2013)Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter a…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach (2008)Undertaking a literature revi…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (2024)Writing a manuscript for publ…PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration (2023)PROBE 2023 guidelines for rep…Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles (2021)Creating Logical Flow When Wr…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies22,917 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement3,296 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2015Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement1,920 cited
  • 2008Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach1,429 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2013
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development
1,392 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2013Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services902 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles40 cited
    • 2023PROBE 2023 guidelines for reporting observational studies in endodontics: Explanation and elaboration30 cited
    • 2024Writing a manuscript for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal: Guidance from the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy12 cited