SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A pandemia e a emergência da Ciência Aberta
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
A pandemia e a emergência da Ciência Aberta (2020)A pandemia e a emergência da Ciência Aber…Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical …Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a n…Gaming the Metrics (2020)Gaming the MetricsUse of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Fac…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Prestigious Science Journals …What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)What is open peer review? A s…Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research (2017)Untangling Academic Publishin…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of th…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science (2012)Reinventing discovery: the ne…Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Science publishing: The troub…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Exploratory Research (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities (2020)Why we publish where we do: Faculty publishing values and their relationship to review, promotion and tenure expectations (2020)Gendered citation practices in the field of communication (2021)ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science (2014)Why should we promote public engagement with science? (2014)Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015)Climate Change Research in View of Bibliometrics (2016)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management730 cited
  • 2012Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science645 cited
  • 2017What is open peer review? A systematic review453 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2019Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations357 cited
  • 2011Science publishing: The trouble with retractions328 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19268 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
  • 2017Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research217 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
213 cited
  • 2020Gaming the Metrics200 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.