SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s Study-Based Register of Randomized Controlled Trials: Development and Content Analysis
12 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s Study-Based Register of Randomized Controlled Trials: Development and Content Analysis (2020)Cochrane Schizophrenia Group’s Study-Base…Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report (2019)Study-based registers reduce …Reproducibility and replicability of systematic reviews (2019)Reproducibility and replicabi…Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers (2019)Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Pa…Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis (2017)Study-based registers of rand…Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions (2017)Reproducible research practic…Academia–pharma partnerships for novel drug discovery: essential or nice to have? (2017)Academia–pharma partnerships …Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews? (2015)Should we search Chinese biom…How systematic reviews cause research waste (2015)How systematic reviews cause …Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Systematic review automation …Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine Must Search Chinese Databases to Reduce Language Bias (2013)Systematic Reviews and Meta-A…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2008)Following 411 Cochrane Protoc…Classification of all pharmacological interventions tested in trials relevant to people with schizophrenia: A study‐based analysis (2021)Classification of all pharmac…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties (2012)Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses (2018)A practical guide to preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (2020)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study (2017)Systematic review of the methodological quality of controlled trials evaluating Chinese herbal medicine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (2017)Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments (2014)Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Improving reference prioritisation with PICO recognition (2019)Searching for Studies (2008)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology (2017)Quality of randomized controlled trials of new generation antidepressants and antipsychotics identified in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI): a literature and telephone interview study (2018)Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases (2019)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Evidence synthesis relevant to COVID-19: a protocol for multiple systematic reviews and overviews of systematic reviews (2020)A meta-analysis of technology use and cognitive aging (2025)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Overstating the evidence – double counting in meta-analysis and related problems (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change (2020)Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study (2022)PRISMA for Review of Management Literature – Method, Merits, and Limitations – An Academic Review (2023)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Evaluation of the comprehensiveness, accuracy and currency of the Cochrane COVID ‐19 Study Register for supporting rapid evidence synthesis production (2021)COVID-19 Living Overview of Evidence repository is highly comprehensive and can be used as a single source for COVID-19 studies (2022)The NICE search filters for treating and managing COVID-19: validation in MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid) (2024)Successful Aging Rates of Global Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024)Successful aging rates of global older adults: A subgroup meta-analysis (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Systematic review automation technologies471 cited
  • 2017Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions114 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?112 cited
  • 2019Introducing RAPTOR: RevMan Parsing Tool for Reviewers110 cited
  • 2017Study-based registers of randomized controlled trials: Starting a systematic review with data extraction or meta-analysis107 cited
  • 2015How systematic reviews cause research waste83 cited
  • 2015Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?76 cited
  • 2019Study-based registers reduce waste in systematic reviewing: discussion and case report62 cited
  • 2008Following 411 Cochrane Protocols to Completion: A Retrospective Cohort Study54 cited
  • 2013Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Traditional Chinese Medicine Must Search Chinese Databases to Reduce Language Bias50 cited
  • 2017Academia–pharma partnerships for novel drug discovery: essential or nice to have?34 cited
  • 2019Reproducibility and replicability of systematic reviews27 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Classification of all pharmacological interventions tested in trials relevant to people with schizophrenia: A study‐based analysis21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work